UX Pilot alternatives for mobile app design
Compare UX Pilot with Sleek, Google Stitch, Figma Make, Uizard and Magic Patterns for iOS and Android app flows, Figma handoff, code export and price.
The right UX Pilot alternative depends on what you are designing. For whole iOS and Android app flows, try Sleek, which only does mobile app design. Google Stitch is the free option for exploring web and mobile UI. Figma Make fits teams prototyping inside Figma. Uizard suits quick drafts from a sketch, and Magic Patterns suits product-feature prototypes.
UX Pilot itself is a strong, actively developed AI design tool, and for many teams it is the right pick. This page is for founders and developers whose next deliverable is a mobile app, and who want to compare UX Pilot vs Sleek and a few other options before paying for one.
We make Sleek. Vendor pages checked on 2026-11-02; we did not run a hands-on test of UX Pilot for this page.
Key takeaways
- UX Pilot designs connected mobile and web screens, works inside Figma through its Nodey agent, and connects to coding agents through an MCP server.
- Sleek is mobile-only: it generates editable iOS and Android screens as one multi-screen app with a single design system.
- Export is the clearest plan difference: UX Pilot lists Figma and code export on paid plans (its Nodey agent in Figma is free to install), while Sleek includes Figma, HTML and React + Tailwind export on every plan, including Free.
- UX Pilot's free plan allows more generation (80 credits a day, up to 13 screens); Sleek Free has 60 one-time credits, one project and three screens.
- Google Stitch, Figma Make, Uizard and Magic Patterns each overlap with UX Pilot at a different step, from free exploration to code-backed prototypes.
UX Pilot vs Sleek: quick comparison
Choose UX Pilot when you design web and mobile products together, work inside a Figma design system, or want design reviews built in. Choose Sleek when the deliverable is a mobile app flow you want to edit in chat and export to Figma or code from any plan. The table summarizes each vendor's own documentation.
| Decision | UX Pilot | Sleek |
|---|---|---|
| Main use | Product UI for web and mobile, from one screen to a full flow | Mobile app design for iOS and Android |
| Starting point | Prompt, PRD, screenshot, reference or Figma components | Chat prompt or a reference image |
| Multi-screen work | Autoflow designs connected screens with shared navigation | One request becomes a multi-screen app with one design system |
| Inside Figma | Nodey agent designs with your real components | Export to Figma as native layers, no plugin |
| Code | HTML, CSS, Tailwind and React (paid plans) | HTML and React + Tailwind (every plan) |
| Coding agents | MCP server with more than 75 tools | Agent skill, MCP server and REST API |
| Extras | UX audits, heatmaps, accessibility review | Mobile app templates |
| Free plan | 80 credits a day (up to 13 screens), 1 project | 60 one-time credits, 1 project, 3 screens |
What is UX Pilot?
UX Pilot describes itself as an AI product design tool built for UX/UI. According to its llms.txt, it turns briefs, PRDs, screenshots, references and a team's Figma design system into editable product designs, from a single screen to a complete flow. It runs on Glide, UX Pilot's own design model, launched with UX Pilot 2.0 in July 2026.
UX Pilot runs in three places: its web app, Figma and coding agents. Nodey is its AI design agent inside Figma, which generates native, editable Figma layers that reuse your components. The MCP server lets Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT, Cursor and other agents generate, import and review designs.
Its app design page covers mobile directly. Autoflow designs connected screens from onboarding to dashboard, and you can design the mobile app and the web app in the same project and visual language. For iOS or Android, UX Pilot says to name the platform in your prompt. It also publishes mobile app templates. Like Sleek, it is a design tool, not an app builder: per that page, it does not add a backend, host your app or publish to the App Store or Google Play.
When is UX Pilot the better choice?
UX Pilot is the better choice when your work spans more than a mobile app, or when a Figma design system already defines how your product looks. It is built for product teams, and its feature set reflects that. Several of these strengths have no direct equivalent in Sleek.
- Web and mobile together. You can design an app and its web dashboard or landing page in one project. Sleek only designs mobile apps.
- Your existing components. UX Pilot imports Figma components on every plan, and Nodey generates with real component instances inside your file.
- Several directions per brief. Its AI instructions page says it generates multiple distinct design directions for the same brief, so you can compare before committing.
- Review before handoff. It runs UX audits with predictive heatmaps, accessibility (WCAG) checks and persona reviews.
- More free generation. Free includes 80 credits a day, up to 13 screens, with no credit card.
If those match how you work, stay with UX Pilot or start there.
Why look for a UX Pilot alternative?
Look for an alternative when the gap is in the mobile app itself or in the handoff. UX Pilot is broad by design: it covers websites, dashboards, diagrams, PRDs, motion and video as well as apps. A founder whose only deliverable is an iOS or Android app may prefer a tool that does that one job.
Export is the most concrete reason. UX Pilot's plan summary lists Figma and code export under Pro and above, and the Free plan is for designing. Nodey, its Figma agent, is free to install and generates inside your Figma file, which covers some Figma workflows. If you want to test the handoff to Figma or to your developer before paying, check which tools include export on their free plan.
Cost structure is the other one. UX Pilot Pro includes 750 credits a month (up to 125 screens). Compare that against how many screens your app needs, including revisions, before choosing a plan.
Which UX Pilot alternatives should you shortlist?
For mobile app design, shortlist Sleek, Google Stitch, Figma Make, Uizard and Magic Patterns. Each one overlaps with UX Pilot at a different step: mobile screens, free exploration, Figma prototyping, quick drafts, or prototypes built on an existing product. Pick two, run the same brief, and compare the result and the export.
| Alternative | What its vendor documents | When to try it | Starting price (USD, as of November 2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sleek | Editable iOS and Android screens as one multi-screen app; Figma, HTML and React + Tailwind export | Your deliverable is a mobile app flow | Free; Starter $29/month, or $20/month billed yearly ($240/year) |
| Google Stitch | UI from prompts and sketches, paste to Figma, HTML/CSS export, voice iteration | You want free exploration of web and mobile UI | Free with a Google account |
| Figma Make | Code-backed, visually editable prototypes using Figma frames and design systems | Your team already designs in Figma | Free Starter with AI credits; Professional Full seat from $16/month billed annually |
| Uizard | Multi-screen prototypes from text, screenshots or hand-drawn sketches | You want a quick first draft from a sketch | Free; Pro $12/month billed annually |
| Magic Patterns | Prototypes on your real design system; Figma export, GitHub sync and MCP | You are prototyping a feature in an existing product | Free; Starter $20/seat/month, or $17 billed annually |
Google Stitch is a Google Labs experiment, free with a Google account, according to Netlify's Stitch guide. Google's launch post describes pasting designs into Figma and exporting front-end code, and its May 2026 update added voice iteration and handoff to Antigravity and Netlify. Our Google Stitch alternatives page compares it with Sleek directly.
Figma Make builds code-backed prototypes you can edit visually, and it can use Make kits, npm packages and Figma frames as design context, per Figma's Make page. Its AI credits are shared across Figma's AI features, per Figma's pricing. See our Figma Make alternatives for mobile app design for that comparison.
Uizard generates multi-screen, editable prototypes from text and converts screenshots and hand-drawn wireframes into editable designs. Its pricing page lists 3 AI generations a month on Free, and React and CSS developer handoff from Pro. Its pricing page lists JPG, PNG and PDF export.
Magic Patterns is aimed at product teams prototyping with their real design system. Its export docs list Figma export, two-way GitHub sync, code download and an MCP server for Cursor or Claude Code.
You may also see Visily in older lists. UX Pilot's migration page says Visily announced its shutdown on October 3, 2026 and closed on October 31, 2026, so it is not on this shortlist.
UX Pilot vs Sleek for whole mobile app flows
Choose Sleek when you want a consistent mobile app, not a set of separate screens. You describe the app in chat or attach a reference image, and Sleek generates editable iOS and Android screens as one multi-screen app with a single design system. You then revise through chat and export.
Three differences matter most for a mobile project:
- Mobile only. Sleek is an AI mobile app design tool, not a website or slide tool. That narrower scope is the point if your product is an app, and a limitation if it is not.
- Export on every plan. Sleek exports to Figma as native layers with no plugin, and to HTML or React + Tailwind code. Per Sleek's llms.txt, these exports are included on every plan, including Free, so you can test the handoff on your first project.
- Agent-driven design. Coding agents such as Claude Code, Cursor and Codex can drive Sleek through the Sleek MCP server, the agent skill and a REST API. Ongoing agent use needs Pro or Team; Free accounts can try it with one-time credits.
React + Tailwind export is front-end code. Sleek does not export SwiftUI, Flutter or React Native, so shipping a native app still needs implementation and testing.
How do UX Pilot and Sleek pricing compare?
Both have a free plan and paid plans priced by credits. Credits are not comparable units across vendors, so compare on screens and exports. As of November 2026, UX Pilot Pro is $29/month or $19/month billed yearly, and Sleek Starter is $29/month or $20/month billed yearly ($240/year). The difference is what each free plan lets you do.
| Plan detail (USD, as of November 2026) | UX Pilot | Sleek |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 80 credits a day (up to 13 screens), 1 project; design only | 60 one-time credits, 1 project, 3 screens; Figma and code export included |
| Entry paid plan | Pro: $29/month, or $19/month billed yearly; 750 credits a month (up to 125 screens) | Starter: $29/month, or $20/month billed yearly ($240/year); 3,000 credits a month (about 100 screens) |
| Next tier | Teams: $39/user/month, or $31/user/month billed yearly | Pro: $69/month, or $30/month billed yearly ($360/year); 20,000 credits a month (about 650 screens), REST API and agent skill |
| Teams | Teams plan above (2 to 15 seats) | Team: $99/seat/month, or $490/seat/year |
UX Pilot's prices come from its plan summary and the plans page. Sleek's come from its llms.txt and MCP guide. For a wider view across twelve tools, see our ranking of AI tools for mobile app design, which scores UX Pilot alongside Sleek.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best UX Pilot alternative for mobile apps?
Can UX Pilot design iOS and Android apps?
Does UX Pilot export to Figma on the free plan?
Is UX Pilot or Sleek cheaper?
Can Claude Code or Cursor use UX Pilot or Sleek?
Is Visily still an option?
Test one real flow before choosing
Pick a flow your app needs, such as onboarding through the first home screen, and run it in UX Pilot and one alternative. Check whether the screens share one visual system, how revisions behave, and what the export gives your developer. If that flow is for an iOS or Android app, start a free Sleek project and inspect the Figma or code export yourself.
Sources and dates checked
All pages below were checked on 2026-11-02. Prices are in USD.
- UX Pilot: llms.txt, AI instructions and plan summary, plans, AI app design, mobile templates, MCP server, Visily migration page
- Sleek: llms.txt, agents.md, MCP guide
- Google Stitch: Google Developers launch post, May 2026 update, Netlify's Stitch guide
- Figma Make: product page, pricing
- Uizard: pricing, Autodesigner
- Magic Patterns: credits and plans, export docs
Keep reading
7 Best Uizard Alternatives in 2026
The best Uizard alternatives in 2026, compared for mobile app design: Sleek, Figma, Google Stitch, Visily, UX Pilot, Claude Design, and Magic Patterns.
7 Best Visily Alternatives in 2026
The best Visily alternatives in 2026, compared for mobile app design: Sleek, Figma, Uizard, Google Stitch, UX Pilot, Claude Design, and Magic Patterns.
9 Best Claude Design Alternatives in 2026
Compare 9 Claude Design alternatives for mobile apps, including Sleek, Figma and Google Stitch, with pricing, exports and a guide to choosing the right tool.